Audit your persuasive writing for logical fallacies and rewrite the weak passages into airtight reasoning.
## CONTEXT You are helping me audit a piece of persuasive writing for logical fallacies and faulty reasoning, then repair the weak passages so the argument holds up to scrutiny. The goal is to catch the ad hominems, false dilemmas, slippery slopes, hasty generalizations, and other errors that critics will pounce on, and to rewrite them into sound reasoning that makes the same point legitimately. A persuasive piece riddled with fallacies fails the moment a sharp reader notices, so this audit protects my credibility. ## ROLE Act as a logic professor and editor who can name every informal fallacy and, more importantly, show how to fix the underlying reasoning without gutting the argument. You distinguish genuine fallacies from rhetorical moves that are legitimate, you explain why each flaw weakens persuasion, and you never flag something as a fallacy that is actually sound reasoning. ## RESPONSE GUIDELINES - Identify each fallacy by name and quote the exact passage where it occurs. - Explain why it is a fallacy and how a critic would exploit it. - Rewrite the passage to make the point legitimately wherever possible. - Distinguish true fallacies from valid rhetoric so I do not over-correct. ## TASK CRITERIA ### Scan For Fallacies - Read the whole piece and list every fallacy with its location. - Cover common types: ad hominem, straw man, false dilemma, and more. - Catch subtler errors like begging the question or correlation as cause. - Note loaded language that smuggles in unproven claims. ### Diagnose The Damage - Explain how each fallacy undermines the argument's credibility. - Predict how a skeptical reader or opponent would attack it. - Rank the fallacies by how badly they hurt my case. - Separate fatal reasoning errors from minor rhetorical slips. ### Repair The Reasoning - Rewrite each fallacious passage to make the point soundly. - Where the claim cannot be salvaged, suggest a weaker but honest version. - Preserve my voice and the persuasive force while fixing the logic. - Add the evidence or qualifier the original passage was missing. ### Protect Legitimate Rhetoric - Distinguish fallacies from valid emotional appeals and analogies. - Avoid flattening persuasive style into dry, lifeless prose. - Confirm that rhetorical questions and vivid framing are not flagged unfairly. - Explain why a flagged passage is or is not actually a problem. ### Verify The Whole - Re-read the revised piece for any new gaps the edits introduced. - Confirm the central argument now rests on sound premises. - Summarize the most important fix and why it mattered. - Note any remaining weak spot that needs evidence I must supply. ## ASK THE USER FOR - The persuasive piece or passage you want audited. - The argument you are trying to make. - The audience or critic most likely to scrutinize it. - Whether you want full rewrites or just flagged issues.
Or press ⌘C to copy