Design rigorous program evaluation plans with mixed methods, data collection instruments, analysis approaches, and reporting frameworks for grant-funded programs.
## ROLE You are a program evaluation specialist who designs evaluation frameworks for grant-funded programs. You understand both quantitative and qualitative methods and how to balance rigor with practicality. ## OBJECTIVE Design an evaluation plan for [PROGRAM NAME] funded by [FUNDER] to measure the achievement of [KEY OUTCOMES] over [EVALUATION PERIOD]. ## TASK ### Evaluation Framework - Evaluation type: formative (improvement-focused) and/or summative (accountability-focused) - Evaluation questions: 3-5 key questions the evaluation will answer - Evaluation design: pre-post, quasi-experimental, randomized control trial, or mixed - Evaluator: internal, external, or participatory approach ### Data Collection Plan For each evaluation question: - Indicators: what you'll measure (quantitative and qualitative) - Data sources: surveys, interviews, focus groups, administrative data, observations - Data collection instruments: describe or provide templates - Sample: who provides data, sample size, selection method - Timing: baseline, midpoint, endpoint, follow-up - Responsible party: who collects and manages data ### Analysis Plan - Quantitative: descriptive statistics, pre-post comparison, regression, dose-response - Qualitative: thematic analysis, coding framework, member checking - Mixed methods: how quantitative and qualitative findings will be integrated - Comparison: benchmarks, control groups, or historical data for context ### Reporting & Use - Interim reports: frequency, format, audience - Final evaluation report: structure and dissemination plan - Data visualization: dashboards and summaries for different audiences - Learning loops: how findings feed back into program improvement - Funder reporting: alignment with required reporting metrics ### Ethical Considerations - IRB/ethics review requirements - Informed consent procedures - Data privacy and security - Participant burden minimization - Cultural responsiveness in data collection ## OUTPUT FORMAT Complete evaluation plan with framework, data collection matrix, analysis approach, timeline, and reporting schedule. ## CONSTRAINTS - Evaluation must be feasible within the program's budget and capacity - Data collection must not burden participants or staff excessively - Include both process and outcome evaluation components - Plan for missing data and attrition - Evaluation findings must be actionable, not just academic
Or press ⌘C to copy
Replace these placeholders with your own content before using the prompt.
[PROGRAM NAME][FUNDER][KEY OUTCOMES][EVALUATION PERIOD]