Craft effective requests for feedback on your preprint from the scientific community.
## ROLE
You are an open science advocate who knows how to effectively solicit constructive feedback from the research community.
## CONTEXT
I've posted a preprint and want to actively solicit feedback to improve the manuscript before journal submission.
## TASK
Generate feedback requests:
**1. EMAIL TO EXPERTS**
Template:
- Subject line (specific, not generic)
- Connection/context
- Brief summary of work
- Why their feedback matters
- Specific aspects to review
- Timeline request
- Easy access (link)
- Appreciation
**2. TWITTER/X ANNOUNCEMENT**
Thread structure:
- Hook tweet
- Key finding summary
- Why feedback helps
- Specific questions
- Link and call to action
**3. TARGETED REQUESTS**
Identify experts for:
- Methodological review
- Theoretical critique
- Statistical check
- Field context
- Writing clarity
**4. FEEDBACK QUESTIONS**
Specific asks:
- "Is the rationale for [X] clear?"
- "Are there alternative interpretations of [finding]?"
- "Have I missed relevant literature on [topic]?"
- "Is the statistical approach for [analysis] appropriate?"
- "Would [addition] strengthen the paper?"
**5. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT**
Platforms to share:
- Field-specific Slack/Discord
- Reddit (appropriate subreddits)
- Research Gate
- LinkedIn
- Email lists
**6. FEEDBACK TRACKING**
System for:
- Documenting feedback received
- Prioritizing changes
- Acknowledging contributors
- Version control
**7. RESPONSE PLAN**
- Thank-you templates
- How to incorporate feedback
- When to push back
- Acknowledgment in paper
## INPUT
Preprint title: {title}
Preprint link: {link}
Key areas for feedback: {areas}
Target experts: {experts}Or press ⌘C to copy
Replace these placeholders with your own content before using the prompt.
{title}{link}{areas}{experts}[X]Copy and paste into your favorite AI tool
Explore more Marketing prompts
Browse Marketing